George W.'s True Believers...Like Dirt, Only Dumber

Posted on Fri, Oct. 22, 2004

Many Bush supporters disregard
Iraq weapons findings

By Frank Davies

Knight Ridder

WASHINGTON - A large majority of President Bush's supporters continue to believe that Iraq either had weapons of mass destruction (47 percent) or a major program to develop them (25 percent), contrary to official findings, a survey taken this month found.

Three out of four Bush backers believe Saddam Hussein provided substantial support to Al-Qaida or was involved in the Sept. 11 terror attacks, while 56 percent said the Sept. 11 Commission found such ties.

In reality, the commission found ``no collaborative relationship'' between Iraq and Al-Qaida.

The survey by the University of Maryland's Program on International Policy Attitudes, released Thursday, shows that the supporters of Bush and Sen. John Kerry have stark differences and see ``separate realities'' about Iraq and other foreign-policy issues.

The poll, conducted by Knowledge Networks, was taken of 968 people Oct. 12-18, after the final report by Charles Duelfer concluded that Iraq did not have a significant weapons of mass destruction program. The margin of error was plus or minus 3.2 percentage points to four percentage points.

Earlier samples of 798 and 959 people were taken in September.

Steven Kull, program director, said Bush supporters had a ``resistance to information'' on several fronts that reflected a powerful bond with the president formed after the Sept. 11 attacks. Kull also cited the perception -- shared by Kerry supporters -- that Bush still asserts that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.

In recent months, Bush has said that he was ``disappointed'' that such weapons were not found, that the search continues and that it was important to ``disarm'' Saddam.

There may be another reason for the misperceptions, Kull said. Asked whether U.S. forces should have invaded Iraq if U.S. intelligence had concluded that Iraq was not making weapons of mass destruction or providing support to Al-Qaida, 58 percent of Bush supporters said no.

``To support the president and to accept that he took the United States to war based on mistaken assumptions is difficult to bear, especially in light of the continuing costs in terms of lives and money,'' Kull said.

``Apparently, to avoid this cognitive dissonance, Bush supporters suppress awareness of unsettling information.''

A Bush campaign official, Reed Dickens, said the perceptions on weapons were understandable ``given that it's only in the last few weeks we've had this definitive finding'' of the Duelfer report. LINK

About Cognitive Dissonance:

Once two cognitions are held and there is a conflict between them, the individual falls into a state of cognitive dissonance.

This may be demonstrated by an individual purchasing a brand of washing machine (George W. Bush), initially believing that it was the best product to buy.

This person's cognition is that a good washing machine has been bought.

However, after the purchase, the individual may be exposed to another cognition informing them that there is a better washing machine (John F. Kerry) out on the market (for example, through an advertisement).

This then leads to an imbalance between cognitions and a psychological state which needs to seek consonance between the two cognitions.

Changing a cognition gives some discomfort: one has to reflect and admit to oneself that one has had a wrong cognition.

Therefore, rather than adapt to these cognitions, one may deride the new improved washing machine (Kerry), and perceive the new advertisement as untrue. This is another way of allowing one's cognitions to be in a consonant state once more.

However, there are even more ways of reducing the state of dissonance.

One example is through selecting information after the purchase.

It might be that a person would purposely avoid other washing machine advertisements...

Knowing that the decision had been made and finding out about other products could lead to some discomfort. LINK

Translation: Bush supporters would rather appear stupid than wrong.

Heavy, heavy sigh.